Maiden Resource - Werumata Limestone Project
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office Address London House, Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, PERTH WA 6000 Postal Address GPO Box 2517, PERTH WA 6831
Phone +61 8 9481 0389 Fax +61 8 9463 6103 Email info@estrellaresources.com.au
14 May 2026
621Mt MAIDEN JORC INFERRED RESOURCE:
WERUMATA LIMESTONE PROJECT, TIMOR LESTE
HIGHLIGHTS
➔ Maiden JORC (2012) Inferred Resource of 621Mt (central estimate) of limestone at the Werumata
Limestone Project, Timor-Leste
➔ Product 1 (High grade limestone suitable for sale as an acid neutralisation agent): 493 Mt at an
average Acid Neutralisation Capacity of 83.2%
➔ Product 2 (Lower grade limestone suitable for industrial uses including AAC blocks, masonry mortar
& cement): 33 Mt at an average Acid Neutralisation Capacity of 35.6%
➔ Product 3 (High-silica material suitable for road paving, construction aggregate, road base & rock
fill): 95 Mt with average silicon dioxide content of 58%
➔ Concession covers ~4,990 hectares in the Lautém Municipality with the drilling to date having tested
only a small portion near the western boundary
➔ Significant resource growth potential: limestone extends over 6km eastward across the concession,
largely untested by drilling
➔ Open cut mining: only economically feasible extraction method
➔ All three products are direct shipping ores requiring only crushing and screening with no further
metallurgical processing.
➔ Accessible location: 170km ENE of Dili on sealed all-weather roads, with potential for export via
coastal shipping
Commenting on the maiden JORC resource, Managing Director Chris Daws said:
"The maiden 621 million tonne Inferred Resource at Werumata is an exceptional starting point
and confirms the project as a potentially significant large-scale limestone development. With
drilling having tested only a fraction of the concession and mineralisation extending for more
than six kilometres eastward, we see substantial upside to further grow the resource base.
This resource provides Estrella with a strong foundation to build a long-term business around
large-scale limestone mining and export, targeting growing infrastructure and industrial
demand across Southeast Asia.
With sales discussions advancing, port access negotiations underway with the Timorese
Government and preparations commencing for a new drilling campaign we believe Werumata
is rapidly emerging as a major regional limestone development project and I can’t wait to
update investors of our progress. Go Estrella!”
ASX: ESR
Resource Summary
Table 1: Inferred Limestone Resource Statement as at 14 May 2026
Category
Product 1 (Mt)
Acid
Neutralisation
Product 2 (Mt)
Industrial Uses
Product 3 (Mt)
Road Base &
Fill
Total Limestone
(Mt)
Lower Estimate 442 30 85 557
Central Estimate 493 33 95 621
Upper Estimate 545 37 104 686
Notes: Resources reported in accordance with the JORC Code (2012 Edition). All products classified as Inferred.
Resource recovery factor of 97% applied to account for voids. Average estimated bulk densities applied: Product 1
(BCUH horizon: 1.88t/bcm &BPUH horizon: 1.64 t/bcm); Product 2 (BCUL Horizon: 1.58t/bcm, LCL Horizon: 1.54t/bcm
& BPUL Horizon: 1.56t/bcm); Product 3 (BPUX Horizon: 1.53t/bcm & CL Horizon: 1.30t/bcm). Lower and upper
estimates reflect ±10.4% variation on central tonnage estimates, being the weighted average coefficient of variation of
the bulk density dataset. A larger density sampling programme would support upgrade to Indicated and Measured
classification. Rounding may cause apparent discrepancies in totals.
Average Resource Grades by Horizon
Table 2: Product Grades by Horizon
Product
Acid Neut.
Capacity
CaO (%) MgO (%) SiO₂ (%)
Product 1 83.2% 44.4% 1.80% 10.8%
Product 2 35.6% 17.0% 2.21% 43.0%
Product 3 11.6% 3.1% 2.69% 58.0%
Total 69.8% 36.7% 1.96% 19.7%
Note: Grades reflect tonnage-weighted averages. Acid Neutralisation Capacity (ANC) = CaCO₃ + 1.1 × MgCO₃.
Product 1 cut-off: >47% ANC (BCUH and BPUH horizons). Product 2: 20–47% ANC (BCUL, LCL, BPUL horizons; avg
CaCO₃ 30.4%). Product 3: <20% ANC (BPUX, CL horizons; avg SiO₂ 58%).
Estrella Resources Limited (ASX: ESR) is pleased to announce the declaration of a Maiden JORC
Code (2012) Inferred Mineral Resource at its Werumata Limestone Project, located in the Lautém
Municipality of Timor-Leste. The Resource estimate was independently prepared by ASEAMCO
Pty Ltd, with Robert de Jongh FAusIMM acting as the Competent Person for Resource Estimation.
The Werumata Limestone Project is held under Exploration and Evaluation Concession
MEL2024-DA-ZA003, which was awarded for four years from 14 May 2025 to Estrella Resources
Ltd Representação Permanente (ESR-RP), a wholly-owned Timor-Leste registered subsidiary of
Estrella Resources Limited (Australia). The concession covers approximately 4,990 hectares
situated 170 km east-northeast of the capital Dili, accessible by sealed all-weather roads.
Geology
Two principal limestone formations host the mineralisation: the Baucau Limestone Formation and
the underlying Batu Putih Chalk. The Baucau Limestone, formed in a shallow marine environment
between the Pleistocene Age and the present, is comprised of coralline reef facies, palaeo shoals,
beaches, grainstones and rudstones, with an average modelled thickness in the drilled area of
approximately 30 metres. The Batu Putih Chalk, formed in a deep marine setting during the
Pliocene epoch, has an average modelled thickness of approximately 26 metres.
Seven resource horizons were defined within these two formations — BCUH, BCUL and LCL
within the Baucau Limestone, and BPUH, BPUX, BPUL and CL within the Batu Putih Chalk —
based on lithology and acid neutralisation values. The beds are sub-horizontal and broadly
tabular, with no faulting identified within the concession area.
Drilling & Sampling
A drilling program commenced on 29 October 2025, comprising 33 Reverse Circulation (RC) drill
holes (2,852m) and 9 diamond drill holes (913m), for a combined total of 3,765m. Drill holes
ranged from 41m to 140m depth. All holes were vertical, which was appropriate given the sub-
horizontal nature of the target formations.
RC holes were sampled at 1-metre intervals and submitted to PT Geoservices in Jakarta,
Indonesia, for XRF fusion analysis reporting 15 elements as oxides. Diamond drill core was used
for geological verification and to provide 87 samples for in-situ bulk density determination using
industry-standard immersion methods. The Competent Person for the Mineral Resource Estimate
visited the site between 23–25 November 2025 and assessed the sampling procedures as
appropriate and representative.
Samples were transported from field to Dili under Estrella personnel supervision, with
international delivery to the laboratory managed by Ceva Logistics, an international courier
service.
Resource Estimation Methodology
The resource estimate was prepared by ASEAMCO Pty Ltd in accordance with the 2012 Edition
of the JORC Code, using a two-dimensional gridding approach appropriate for this sub-horizontal,
tabular sedimentary deposit. Geovia Minex software was used for structural floor modelling and
geostatistical analysis of horizon thickness and Acid Neutralisation Capacity was conducted using
SGeMs software.
A financial analysis determined an economic cut-off grade of 47% Acid Neutralisation Capacity
for Product 1. The geostatistical analysis confirmed that the drill hole spacing was sufficient to
establish geological and grade continuity appropriate for Inferred Resource classification.
However, as density data was obtained from less than 3% of recovered drill core length,
classification of resources at higher than Inferred confidence was not considered appropriate.
Comprehensive bulk density testing of the higher-grade BCUH and BPUH horizons would be
required to support upgrade to Indicated or Measured classification.
Voids were encountered in every drill hole, with an overall void percentage of 2.8%. A recovery
factor of 97% was applied to all reported tonnages to account for this. The coefficient of variation
for bulk density data was 10.4%, and accordingly the resource estimates are presented as a
range of ±10.4% around the central estimate.
Products
Three products have been identified for mining:
• Product 1 – Acid Neutralisation: High-grade limestone (>47% Acid Neutralisation
Capacity) suitable for sale as an acid neutralisation agent in agricultural and industrial
applications.
• Product 2 – Industrial Uses: Lower-grade limestone (20–47% Acid Neutralisation
Capacity; average CaCO₃ of 30.4%) suitable for Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC)
blocks, high quality masonry mortar, and as a blending component for Portland cement
manufacture.
• Product 3 – Road Base & Rock Fill: High-silica material (<20% Acid Neutralisation
Capacity; average SiO₂ of 58%) ideal for road paving, construction aggregate, road base
and rock fill. The majority of Product 3 tonnage (88 Mt central estimate) arises from the
CL horizon at the base of the sequence; if that horizon is excluded, only 5.5–6.8 Mt of
Product 3 would be produced as incidental material during extraction of Products 1 and 2.
The Company is evaluating the economics of including the CL horizon.
Open cut mining is the only economically feasible extraction method. All three products are direct
shipping ores requiring only crushing and screening with no further metallurgical processing.
Next Steps
• Engage with prospective customers and negotiate commercial sales agreements.
• Negotiate port land access agreement with the Timorese Government.
• Community consultation in support of new drilling round targeting very high-grade limestone.
Limestone Uses & Market Context
Limestone of this quality has a broad range of potential end uses, providing Estrella with multiple
market opportunities:
• Acid neutralisation agent for industrial and metallurgical applications
• Raw feed for cement manufacture
• Agent for agricultural soil amendment
• Construction aggregate
• Road base and fill material
Indonesia and Southeast Asia in general is undertaking significant infrastructure development
and presents an adjacent local market opportunity for construction materials. Regional markets
in South, Southeast and North Asia provide additional export potential for acid neutralisation and
cement raw material products.
Growth Potential
The drilling completed to date has tested only a limited area near the western boundary of the
concession, covering two plateaus with an average drill spacing of approximately 300 metres.
The Baucau Limestone and Batu Putih Chalk formations extend more than 6 kilometres across
the concession to its eastern boundary — an area largely untested by drilling that dwarfs the
currently drilled footprint. The Company intends to conduct further drilling to test these extensions
with the potential to substantially increase the total resource tonnes.
ESR-RP also holds additional Exploration and Evaluation Concessions (MEL2025-DA-ZA001,
MEL2025-DA-ZA002 and MEL2025-DA-ZA004) and Reconnaissance Permits (ESR-RP-05,
ESR-RP-07 and ESR-RP-08) in the region, applications for which are pending conversion to
Exploration and Evaluation Concessions.
JORC Code Compliance
This announcement has been prepared in compliance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code
and the ASX Listing Rules. The JORC Code Table 1 checklist supporting this resource is included
in the independent technical report prepared by ASEAMCO Pty Ltd (Project 26244, May 2026),
which has been annexed in this ASX announcement. All material assumptions underpinning the
resource estimate are disclosed in this announcement.
The board has authorised this announcement for ASX release.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Christopher J. Daws
Managing Director
Estrella Resources Limited
E: info@estrellaresources.com.au
Media:
David Tasker
Managing Director
Chapter One Advisors
E: dtasker@chapteroneadvisors.com.au
Competent Persons Statement – Exploration
The information in this announcement that relates to Sampling Techniques, Data and the Reporting of
Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Mr Peter Spitalny, a full-time employee of Estrella
Resources Ltd. Mr Spitalny is a Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has
sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration to qualify
as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
Competent Persons Statement – Mineral Resource Estimates
The information in this announcement that relates to the Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources is
based on information compiled by Mr Robert de Jongh BE Mining (Hons) FAusIMM, Managing Director of
ASEAMCO Pty Ltd. Mr de Jongh is a Fellow of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and has
sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration
to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
Compliance Statement
Both Mr Spitalny and Mr de Jongh consent to the inclusion of the matters based on their information in the
form and context in which it appears in this announcement. The Company confirms that it is not aware of
any new information or data that materially affects the information included in this announcement.
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements which have not been based solely on
historical facts but, rather, on ESR’s current expectations about future events and on a number of
assumptions which are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies many of which are outside the
control of ESR and its directors, officers and advisers.
Werumata Limestone Project
STATEMENT OF LIMESTONE RESOURCES
May 2026
May 2026 Project 26244
AUSTRALIAN & SOUTH EAST ASIAN MINING CONSULTANTS
Werumata Limestone Project
Statement of Limestone Resources
Project No: 26244
i
Executive Summary
ASEAMCO Pty Ltd (ASEAMCO) was commissioned by Estrella Resources Limited
(Estrella) to prepare a statement of the open cut limestone resources contained within
the Werumata Limestone Deposit Exploration and Evaluation Concession MEL2024-
DA-ZA003 (The Concession) in accordance with the 2012 Edition of the JORC Code.
The Competent Person for Resource Estimation, Robert de Jongh, made a site visit
between 23rd
and 25th
November 2025 during which the following items were observed:
o Location and infrastructure
o Geological setting
o Drilling progress
o Drillhole logging and sampling methods
Location, Land Tenure and Licensing
The Concession lies on the western border of the Lautém Municipality across sucos
Euquisi, Ililai, Saelari, Samalari and Nunira and has a total area of 4443 hectares. It is
located 170km ENE from the capital city of Dili and is accessed by sealed all-weather
roads.
The Concession was awarded for 4 years on 14th
May 2025 to Estrella Resources Ltd
Representação Permanente (ESR-RP) having 100% ownership. ESR-RP is
registered in Timor-Leste and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Estrella Resources
Limited.
Geology
The targeted mineralisation lies within the Baucau Limestone Formation and the
underlying Batu Putih Chalk. The Baucau Limestone is well exposed near the coastline
and was formed between the Pleistocene Age and the present time in a shallow marine
environment. It is comprised of coralline reef facies, palaeo shoals and beaches, along
with grainstones and rudstones. The average modelled thickness of the Baucau
Limestone in the area tested by drilling is approximately 30m.
The Batu Putih Chalk was formed in a deep marine setting in the Pliocene epoch and
was deposited upon an undulating surface caused by erosion of the underlying older
Cretaceous period sedimentary rocks. The average modelled thickness of the Batu
Putih Chalk in the area tested by drilling is approximately 26m.
Variably calcareous marl beds are associated with both the Baucau Limestone and
Batu Putih Chalk. The limestone, chalk and marl beds are sub-horizontal and broadly
tabular, as expected in sediments deposited in marine settings.
Defined Horizons and Limestone Quality
The drillhole intersections were classified into seven horizons based on lithology and
assay results. In stratigraphic order these horizons were BCUH, BCUL, LCL, BPUH,
BPUX, BPUL and CL.
It was advised that three products were proposed to be mined and sold from this
deposit:
Werumata Limestone Project
Statement of Limestone Resources
Project No: 26244
ii
Product 1: A high-quality product to be sold for the purposes of acid neutralisation;
Product 2: A lower quality product designated for other industrial uses such as the
manufacture of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) blocks; mixing with
lime to produce high quality masonry mortar; or as a blending component
for the manufacture of Portland cement, and;
Product 3: A product, which due to its high silica content, is ideal for road paving,
construction aggregate, road base and rock fill.
Due to the cost of mining and value of these products the only economically feasible
extraction technique is the open cut mining method.
Because the sulphur content of the limestone is extremely low it can be concluded that
the calcium and magnesium contents of the limestone overwhelmingly exist as calcium
carbonate and magnesium carbonate. On a scale in which pure calcium carbonate
has an acid neutralising capacity of 100, magnesium carbonate has an acid
neutralising capacity of at least 110. For Product 1 the acid neutralisation capacity
was calculated using the assay values for Calcium and Magnesium Oxide assuming
that all calcium and magnesium exist as carbonates.
Costs and revenues were provided by Estrella. These were considered to be
reasonable. A brief financial analysis was undertaken which determined that the cut-
off grade for acid neutralisation capacity (ANC) for Product 1 was approximately 47%,
while for Product 2 the cut-off grade for ANC was set at 20% which resulted in an
average calcium carbonate content of 30.4% for this product. Product 3 was
designated as any material with ANC less than 20%.
Resources
A geostatistical analysis of horizon thickness was attempted on each of the seven
identified horizons. This analysis was successful for the higher grade BCUH, and
BPUH horizons as well as for the BCUL horizon. Other methods were used for the
remaining horizons. The modelling techniques used for each horizon are presented in
Table A.
Table A – Modelling techniques used for horizon thickness
Horizon Modelling Technique Used
BCUH Geostatistics / Point Kriging
BCUL Geostatistics / Point Kriging
LCL Inverse Distance
BPUH Geostatistics / Point Kriging
BPUX General Purpose Gridding
BPUL General Purpose Gridding
CL Geostatistics / Point Kriging
The geostatistical analysis was successful for the higher-grade horizons and would
ordinarily have permitted the classification of those resources into Measured, Indicated
and Inferred categories, however due to the fact that the density data was obtained
from approximately 2% of the length of drill core it was considered that the density data
was insufficient to support anything but Inferred Resources. The other horizons were
also classified as Inferred.
Werumata Limestone Project
Statement of Limestone Resources
Project No: 26244
iii
The overall coefficient of variation within the density data was 10.4%, consequently,
assuming a normal distribution for the density values, the likely range of values for the
resources is the mean plus or minus 10.4% of the mean. Raising the higher-grade
horizons to include Measured and Indicated status would require comprehensive
testing of the bulk density of the diamond drill core for those horizons.
Every exploration hole contained voids. These voids need to be taken into account
when estimating resources. Overall the void percentage was found to be 2.8%. This
value was rounded and used to estimate the recovery at 97%. The modelled tonnages
were multiplied by 97% to obtain the reported resources.
A summary of the resources is presented in Table B.
Table B – Summary of Total Inferred Resources
Tonnage
Estimate
Product 1
(Mt)
Product 2
(Mt)
Product 3
(Mt)
Total
Product
(Mt)
Lower 442 30 85 557
Central 493 33 95 621
Upper 545 37 104 686
Note that the values in Table B may not add up due to rounding.
The relatively low economic value for Product 3 may result in a decision not to mine
the CL horizon located at the base of the stratigraphic sequence. Excluding this
horizon from the resources would result in a reduction of the Central Estimate of the
resources from 621 million tonnes to 533 million tonnes, leaving only 5.5 to 6.8 million
tonnes of Product 3 material to be mined in association with the extraction of Products
1 and 2.
Werumata Limestone Project
Statement of Limestone Resources
Project No: 26244
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................................6
2 METHODOLOGY......................................................................................................................................7
2.1 PROCEDURE.........................................................................................................................................................7
2.2 DATA AND REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................7
3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION........................................................................................................................8
3.1 LOCATION AND ACCESS.....................................................................................................................................8
3.1.1 Limestone Use...................................................................................................................................................................8
3.2 HISTORY, LICENSING AND LAND TENURE .....................................................................................................9
4 GEOLOGY................................................................................................................................................ 10
4.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY....................................................................................................................................... 10
4.2 LOCAL GEOLOGY.............................................................................................................................................. 10
4.2.1 Stratigraphy ...................................................................................................................................................................10
4.2.2 Drilling, Sampling and Logging Techniques.....................................................................................................13
4.2.3 Sample Transfer and Laboratory Testing .........................................................................................................14
4.2.4 Correlation and Structural Interpretation........................................................................................................14
4.2.5 Assay Results ..................................................................................................................................................................15
5 MODELLING........................................................................................................................................... 16
5.1 STRUCTURAL MODELLING............................................................................................................................. 16
5.1.1 Structure Floor Modelling ........................................................................................................................................16
5.1.2 Structure Thickness Modelling............................................................................................................................... 16
5.1.3 Modelling of Assays...................................................................................................................................................... 17
5.1.4 Density Data...................................................................................................................................................................18
6 RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................... 21
6.1 PRODUCTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 21
6.2 AREAL EXTENTS.............................................................................................................................................. 21
6.3 THICKNESS CONSTRAINTS............................................................................................................................. 21
6.4 RESOURCE RECOVERY .................................................................................................................................... 21
6.5 RESOURCE POLYGONS .................................................................................................................................... 21
6.5.1 Resource Polygons ....................................................................................................................................................... 21
6.6 RESOURCE ESTIMATES................................................................................................................................... 32
7 STATEMENT OF COMPETENCE....................................................................................................... 33
8 JORC CODE – TABLE 1 – WERUMATA PROJECT......................................................................... 34
The supporting documentation is included in the following appendices as separate files:
APPENDIX A – DRILLHOLE SURVEY DATA
APPENDIX B – DRILLHOLE HORIZON INTERCEPTS
APPENDIX C – REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILLHOLE LIMESTONE ASSAYS
APPENDIX D – REVERSE CIRCULATION LTHOLOGY LOGS
APPENDIX E – DIAMOND DRILLHOLE LTHOLOGY LOGS
APPENDIX F – DIAMOND DRILLHOLE DENSITY RESULTS
Werumata Limestone Project
Statement of Limestone Resources
Project No: 26244
v
List of Tables
TABLE 4.1 – MODELLED HORIZONS ........................................................................................ 11
TABLE 4.2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ASSAY RESULTS....................................................... 15
TABLE 5.1 – STRUCTURAL FLOOR MODELLING PARAMETERS ................................................. 16
TABLE 5.2 – MODELLING TECHNIQUES USED FOR HORIZON THICKNESS ................................... 16
TABLE 5.3 – SEMI-VARIOGRAM PARAMETERS FOR THICKNESS ............................................... 17
TABLE 5.4 – SEMI-VARIOGRAM PARAMETERS FOR ACID NEUTRALISATION CAPACITY ........... 17
TABLE 5.5 – ACID NEUTRALISATION CAPACITY MODELLING PARAMETERS ............................ 18
TABLE 5.6 – DENSITY DATA STATISTICS.................................................................................. 19
TABLE 5.7 – DENSITY ESTIMATES FOR EACH MODELLED HORIZON........................................... 20
TABLE 6.1 – SUMMARY OF RESOURCES BY HORIZON & PRODUCT .......................................... 32
TABLE 6.2 – PERCENTAGE OF RESOURCES BY HORIZON & PRODUCT ...................................... 32
List of Figures
FIGURE 3.1 – LOCATION OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................. 8
FIGURE 4.1 – STRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN.................................................................................. 11
FIGURE 4.2 – PLAN SHOWING CONCESSION BOUNDARY, DRILL HOLE LOCATIONS AND
TOPOGRAPHY..................................................................................................... 12
FIGURE 4.3 – INTERPRETED HORIZONS ................................................................................... 14
FIGURE 5.1 – LOGGED DENSITY VS CALCULATED DENSITY FOR VALUES WITHIN 10% ............. 19
FIGURE 6.1 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – BCUH .......................................................... 23
FIGURE 6.2 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – BCUL........................................................... 24
FIGURE 6.3 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – LCL.............................................................. 25
FIGURE 6.4 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – BPUH........................................................... 26
FIGURE 6.5 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – BPUX........................................................... 27
FIGURE 6.6 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – BPUL ........................................................... 28
FIGURE 6.7 – INFERRED RESOURCE POLYGON – CL ................................................................ 29
FIGURE 6.8 – CROSS-SECTIONS 1 & 2 THROUGH GEOLOGICAL MODEL ..................................... 30
FIGURE 6.9 – CROSS-SECTION 3 THROUGH GEOLOGICAL MODEL.............................................. 31
Werumata Limestone Project
Statement of Limestone Resources 6
Project No: 26244
1 Introduction
ASEAMCO Pty Ltd (ASEAMCO) was commissioned by Estrella Resources Limited
(Estrella) to prepare a statement of the open cut limestone resources contained within
the Werumata Limestone Deposit Exploration and Evaluation Concession MEL2024-
DA-ZA003 (The Concession) in accordance with the Australasian Code for Reporting
of Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code), 2012.
The Concession was awarded for 4 years on 14th
May 2025 to Estrella Resources Ltd
Representação Permanente (ESR-RP) having 100% ownership. ESR-RP is
registered in Timor-Leste and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Estrella Resources
Limit
Share your feedback
Discover