Assays received and further Manganese intersected drilling
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX: ESR
4 September 2025
Assays Received and Further Manganese
Intersected in Drilling
HIGHLIGHTS
➔ First assays received from the Iri Miri Manganese Prospect (Table 1)
➢
EMDD001 intersected 6.45m @ 51.7% Mn
➢
EMDD002 intersected 8.05m @ 53.0% Mn
➢
EMDD003 intersected 1.5m @ 35.8% Mn
➔ Exploration strategy altered to target identified primary and secondary manganese beds within Noni
Formation
➢
EMDD022 intersected a total of 5.8m in two separate zones of secondary enriched
manganese from 4.8m down hole (Figure 1 and Table 2)
➢
EMDD023 intersected 2.15m of manganese oxides from 8.25m down hole (Table 2)
➔ Additional holes following mineralisation along strike to be drilled as the Company continues its
maiden Timor-Leste campaign, which consists of an initial 3,000m diamond and 10,000m RC drilling
Figure 1: Secondary and detrital manganese in EMDD022. For visual estimates and visual estimates disclaimer please
refer to Table 2. Assay results are expected in 6 weeks.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Office Address London House, Level 8, 216 St Georges Terrace, PERTH WA 6000 Postal Address GPO Box 2517, PERTH WA 6831
Phone +61 8 9481 0389 Fax +61 8 9463 6103
Email info@estrellaresources.com.au
Estrella Resources Limited (ASX: ESR) (Estrella or the Company) is pleased to announce the receipt of
assays from PT Geoservices, an accredited laboratory in Jakarta, from the first three holes at the
Company’s Ira Miri prospect located in Timor-Leste, as well as continued primary and secondary
manganese discoveries from ongoing drilling.
Commenting on the exploration activities, Managing Director Chris Daws said:
“Estrella continues to successfully prove up its manganese targets as we progress the early stages of
Timor-Leste’s first ever modern minerals drilling.
These first assays in particular are significant as they confirm our initial discoveries and demonstrate the
potential for Timor-Leste to host high-grade manganese mineralisation.
Estrella possesses a large number of targets to test in this virtually unexplored region and we are
systematically progressing through these prospects. In particular, recent angled drilling across our initial
drill holes has emphasised the potential for further discoveries along strike and our geological team
continues to update our modelling to incorporate the latest data.
With drilling underway at Ira Miri, a large-scale surveying program across our Timor-Leste concessions
and preparations for limestone drilling at Werumata, it’s all hands on deck. Go Estrella!
President & C.E.O. of Murak Rai Timor E.P. Mr Jose Manuel Goncalves
“We are pleased at the steady progress of the drilling at Ira Miri, the exploration teams have done an
incredible job in obtaining these results after the initial discovery. The assays returned are fantastic,
were worth waiting for and bode very well for future exploration activities. Our teams are working sideby-side to understand the economic importance of the manganese at Ira Miri and to unlock the true
mineral potential of Timor-Leste”.
The Company’s maiden hole EMDD001 was drilled vertically into outcropping manganese and successfully
encountered thick mineralisation, however the hole ended in mineralisation due to technical difficulties. The
hole was subsequently twinned by EMDD002 to improve recovery of the friable manganese oxides. Both
holes intersected primary manganese with a thick zone of secondary enrichment >50% Mn.
EMDD003 was drilled vertically approximately 15m to the north of EMDD001 and EMDD002 anticipating a
flatter supergene horizon between these two locations (Figure 3).
Table 1 below shows the significant assay intercepts and Table 3 shows the individual assay results.
Table 1: Significant results for EMDD001, EMDD002 and EMDD003
Hole_ID
mFrom
mTo
Interval
Mn %
Al2O3 %
Fe2O3 %
P%
Si %
EMDD001
1.35
7.8
6.45
51.7
0.6
0.1
0.1
7.1
EMDD002
0.25
8.30
8.05
53.0
1.0
0.3
0.0
3.8
EMDD003
8.3
9.80
1.5
35.8
4.2
1.7
0.0
14.7
EMDD004 to EMDD021
Not sampled – Regional scout drilling for stratigraphy
Subsequent trenching has revealed several primary manganese horizons within the Noni Formation dipping
between 40 and 70 degrees to the north which are the source of the manganese. This mineralisation has
later been redistributed in the much flatter weathering profile and upgraded by secondary processes.
EMDD022 and EMDD023 were the first in a series of angled holes that will specifically target the primary
horizons and allow the Company to project them up into the tertiary weathering zone where the supergene
enrichment first started. These zones were subsequently covered by more limestones (the Corraline
Limestone and Batu Puthi Chalk) before being re-exposed in more recent times (Figure 2).
Figure 2: Primary manganese enrichment zone model applicable to Ira Miri
Both EMDD022 and EMDD023 intersected secondary enrichment, and the visual estimates are shown in
Table 2 below.
Table 2: Visual estimates of EMDD022 and EMDD023
Hole ID
EMDD022
EMDD023
m From
m To
Description
0
1.7
Baucau Limestone
1.7
4.8
Noni Formation Muds
4.8
5
90% Manganese oxides
5
7.7
50% Manganese oxide, 50% clay
7.7
10
Noni Formation Chert
10
12.1
50% Manganese oxide, 50% clay
12.1
29.3
Noni Formation Chert
0
3.5
Baucau Limestone
3.5
5.15
Old alluvial cover
5.15
8.25
Noni Formation Muds
8.25
10.4
70% Manganese oxide, 30% clay
10.4
20.6
Noni Formation Chert
Cautionary Statement: The Company draws attention to uncertainty in reporting visual results. Visual estimates of
mineral abundance should never be considered a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or
grades are the factor of principal economic interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding
impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations.
The secondary enrichment interpretation of these intersections is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Cross-Section 270115 East showing current drilling at the first Ira Miri outcrop site showing the interpreted
outline of intersected secondary manganese mineralisation.
Next Steps
With the completion of the scout drilling program which defined the Noni Formation – Triassic Sediment
boundary (EMDD004 to EMDD021), the company can move into more angled drilling targeting the Noni
contact along with bedding parallel hypogene horizons which exist within the formation.
The current round of drilling at Ira Miri will continue to define a 20,000 to 30,000 tonne Market Appraisal
Parcel of supergene manganese that is planned to be extracted prior to the end of the calendar year.
The drilling will chase the extents of mineralisation along strike within the supergene horizon just below
surface between two main areas of outcropping manganese. This line is represented below in yellow in
Figure 4. This is the projection of where the primary mineralisation may be enriched just below surface if it
has not previously been eroded out.
Location of Drilling
Figure 4: Location of the mapped detrital and subcropping secondary manganese along with the geological boundary between the
Noni Formation (manganese potential) and the underlying Triassic sediments. The regional scout drill holes are shown in
blue. The yellow circle depicts the location of current angled drilling.
The Board has authorised for this announcement to be released to the ASX.
ENDS
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Christopher J. Daws
Managing Director
Estrella Resources Limited
+61 8 9481 0389
info@estrellaresources.com.au
Media:
David Tasker
Managing Director
Chapter One Advisors
E: dtasker@chapteroneadvisors.com.au
T: +61 433 112 936
InvestorHub
https://investorhub.estrellaresources.com.au/link/y1Bbde
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement contains certain forward-looking statements which have not been based solely on historical facts
but, rather, on ESR’s current expectations about future events and on a number of assumptions which are subject to
significant uncertainties and contingencies many of which are outside the control of ESR and its directors, officers and
advisers.
Competent Person Statement
The information in this announcement relating to Exploration Results is based on information compiled by Steve Warriner,
who is the Group Exploration Manager of Estrella Resources, and a member of The Australasian Institute of
Geoscientists. Mr Warriner has sufficient experience relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration, and to the activity they are undertaking to qualify as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of
the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resource and Ore Reserves”. Mr Warriner consents
to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears.
Cautionary Statement of Visual Estimates
This announcement contains references to visual results and visual estimates of mineralisation. The Company draws
attention to uncertainty in reporting visual results. Visual estimates of mineral abundance should never be considered
a proxy or substitute for laboratory analyses where concentrations or grades are the factor of principal economic
interest. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties
relevant to valuations.
Table 3: Full assay results
Hole_ID
SampleID
mFrom
mTo
Interval
Recovery
Mn %
Al2O3 %
Fe2O3 %
P%
Si %
EMDD001
CBR115001
0
1.35
1.35
75%
0.89
8.47
2.96
0.03
15.36
EMDD001
CBR115002
1.35
2.35
1
75%
55.92
0.61
<0.01
0.05
2.06
EMDD001
CBR115003
2.35
3.35
1
100%
55.38
0.35
<0.01
0.05
5.36
58.92
0.43
<0.01
0.07
1.42
EMDD001
CBR115004
3.35
4.35
1
100%
EMDD001
CBR115005
4.35
5.7
1.35
36%
58.81
0.61
<0.01
0.06
2.02
EMDD001
CBR115006
5.7
6.7
1
20%
37.13
0.94
0.41
0.05
17.48
EMDD001
CBR115007
6.7
7.8
1.1
86%
42.41
0.42
0.29
0.04
15.31
Hole_ID
SampleID
mFrom
mTo
Interval
Recovery
Mn %
Al2O3 %
Fe2O3 %
P%
Si %
EMDD002
CBR115008
0.25
1.20
0.95
75%
55.66
0.81
<0.01
0.05
3.40
EMDD002
CBR115009
1.20
2.20
1.00
80%
52.88
0.80
<0.01
0.05
5.26
56.96
0.32
<0.01
0.06
2.79
EMDD002
CBR115010
2.20
3.20
1.00
94%
EMDD002
CBR115011
3.20
4.20
1.00
60%
55.60
0.53
<0.01
0.06
4.94
EMDD002
CBR115012
4.20
5.20
1.00
75%
56.97
1.24
<0.01
0.06
3.48
EMDD002
CBR115013
5.20
6.00
0.80
78%
56.82
0.88
<0.01
0.05
3.57
13.29
11.57
5.23
0.05
24.06
EMDD002
CBR115014
6.00
6.45
0.45
100%
EMDD002
CBR115015
6.45
7.70
1.25
100%
51.59
0.33
<0.01
0.07
6.81
EMDD002
CBR115016
7.70
8.30
0.60
57%
58.84
0.66
<0.01
0.06
1.30
EMDD002
CBR115017
8.30
9.30
1.00
100%
5.33
8.38
4.62
0.03
32.97
2.10
8.69
4.91
0.03
35.08
EMDD002
CBR115018
9.30
10.30
1.00
90%
EMDD002
CBR115019
10.30
11.30
1.00
90%
0.08
10.46
10.24
0.03
32.94
EMDD002
CBR115020
11.30
12.30
1.00
89%
<0.01
8.23
2.73
0.02
38.09
Hole_ID
SampleID
mFrom
mTo
Interval
Recovery
Mn %
Al2O3 %
Fe2O3 %
P%
Si %
EMDD003
CBR115171
5.30
6.30
1.00
100%
<0.01
10.64
4.46
0.03
34.13
EMDD003
CBR115172
6.30
7.30
1.00
90%
0.15
11.68
5.89
0.07
32.05
EMDD003
CBR115173
7.30
8.30
1.00
90%
3.88
8.64
3.91
0.04
32.89
6.66
2.70
0.03
26.59
EMDD003
CBR115174
8.30
8.80
0.50
77%
16.27
EMDD003
CBR115175
8.80
9.30
0.50
92%
57.74
0.75
<0.01
0.05
1.91
EMDD003
CBR115176
9.30
9.80
0.50
90%
33.38
5.17
2.25
0.05
15.45
EMDD003
CBR115177
9.80
10.80
1.00
90%
<0.01
9.79
4.36
0.02
36.45
100%
<0.01
14.21
4.03
0.02
33.54
EMDD003
CBR115178
10.80
11.80
1.00
Table 4: Collar and survey details
Hole_ID
East
North
RL
Depth
Dip
Azi
EMDD001
270116
9068126
123.566
7.8
-90
0
EMDD002
270116
9068127
123.566
20.3
-90
0
EMDD003
270116
9068142
125.5
18.38
-90
0
EMDD022
270116
9068138
125
29.3
-60
180
EMDD023
270116
9068146
126
35.7
-60
180
APPENDIX 1 JORC TABLE 1 – TIMOR-LESTE EXPLORATION
Section 1 - Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
Sampling
techniques
Drilling
techniques
Drill sample
recovery
JORC Code explanation
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g. cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to
ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement
tools or systems used.
• Aspects
of
the
determination
of
mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’
work has been done this would be relatively
simple (e.g. ‘reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg
was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for
fire assay’). In other cases more explanation
may be required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems.
Unusual
commodities
or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine
nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse circulation,
open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger,
Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of
diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other
type, whether core is oriented and if so, by
what method, etc).
Commentary
•
Determination of mineralisation has been
based on geological logging of diamond
core and field trenching with metal
concentration confirmed by a Bruker S1
pXRF.
•
Diamond core is drilled PQ3, cut in half
using a hand-grinder for competent core or
split using a chisel for sooty, less
competent core and clay.
•
Core is split perpendicular to bedding
when
primary
mineralisation
is
encountered.
•
At the lab the full sample is crushed and
pulverized to 90% passing 75 um.
•
A subsample undergoes fusion and XRF
analysis.
•
Samples are analysed at PT Geoservices
in Jakarta, Indonesia
•
Diamond drilling has been undertaken
utilising HQ and PQ triple tube.
•
Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative nature
of the samples.
Whether a relationship exists between
sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative
in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
The total length and percentage of the
relevant intersections logged.
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
•
Recoveries are calculated based upon the
depth drilled and compared to core
recovered.
Sample recovery using the man-portable
diamond rig is below an acceptable
standard and a more suitable diamond drill
and chemical water treatment regime is in
place which has significantly lifted
recoveries.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all
sub-sampling
stages
to
maximise
•
•
•
Logging
•
•
•
Subsampling
techniques
and sample
preparation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Rock-chip and core samples were
geologically logged for mineral content
and photographed prior to sending for
assay or screening by pXRF.
Drill core has also been geologically
logged.
The trenches have been mapped and
sampled.
Sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the mineralisation which in
manganese oxides is very fine.
Sampling on core is performed by splitting
or cutting the core in half, perpendicular to
bedding when observed.
The sample sizes are adequate for the
grain size of the material being sampled.
Criteria
Quality of
assay data
and
laboratory
tests
Verification
of sampling
and
assaying
JORC Code explanation
representivity of samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling
is representative of the in-situ material
collected, including for instance results for
field duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of
the assaying and laboratory procedures
used and whether the technique is
considered partial or total.
• For geophysical tools, spectrometers,
handheld XRF instruments, etc, the
parameters used in determining the analysis
including instrument make and model,
reading times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures adopted
(e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external
laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and
precision have been established.
Commentary
•
•
No prior modern exploration has been
conducted in the area. Mineralisation has
been verified by several external parties.
•
EMDD002 twinned EMDD001 with very
similar results
•
No adjustments to assay data were
undertaken.
•
Geological and recovery data is measured
and entered digitally into logsheets which
are then stored on the Company cloud
storage system.
•
Drillhole collar and survey information is
also recorded.
•
Timor personnel use GRID software on
mobile phones to record GPS locations,
sampling data and photographs. Mobile
phone accuracy (shown during coordinate
capture) is set at a maximum tolerance of
5m.
Topographic control is accomplished
using 5m spaced satellite point data.
Drillholes are located using a Garmin GPS
Samples are decided upon geological
characteristics and observed dilution.
Minimum 30cm sample widths can be
taken, ranging up to 1.2m depending on
core characteristics.
No composites have been taken.
•
•
•
Location of
data points
•
•
•
Data spacing
and
distribution
•
•
•
Orientation
of data in
relation to
geological
structure
Sample
security
•
•
•
The verification of significant intersections
by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
The use of twinned holes.
Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other
locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
Specification of the grid system used.
Quality and adequacy of topographic
control.
Data spacing for reporting of Exploration
Results.
Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate
for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and classifications
applied.
Whether sample compositing has been
applied.
Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is
known, considering the deposit type.
If the relationship between the drilling
orientation and the orientation of key
mineralised structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this should be
assessed and reported if material.
The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Samples are being analysed at PT
Geoservices in Jakarta using an XRF
Fusion technique for 15 elements and all
samples are also being tested for Au by
fire assay a 50g sub-sample.
The technique is considered total.
Lab standards and blanks are adequate at
this stage of the exploration program.
Sampling perpendicular to bedding will
occur when bedding can be observed in
the core.
This is not necessarily observable in
secondary enrichment zones.
The drilling is generally at a high angle to
mineralisation.
Exported samples are in the possession of
ESR personnel from the core processing
site and through customs in Atambua in
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Audits or
reviews
•
The results of any audits or reviews of
sampling techniques and data.
Commentary
Indonesia, where they are transferred to
ABC Express for delivery to the lab in
Jakarta.
•
No independent audit or review has been
undertaken on the Lab.
•
Independent reviews on geological
logging and sampling techniques have
been done and all methods used are at
industry standard.
Section 2 - Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria
Mineral
tenement and
land tenure
status
JORC Code explanation
• Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or material
issues with third parties such as joint
ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties,
native title interests, historical sites,
wilderness
or
national
park
and
environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the time
of reporting along with any known
impediments to obtaining a license to
operate in the area.
Exploration
done by other
parties
•
Acknowledgment
and
appraisal
exploration by other parties.
Geology
•
Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
of
Commentary
•
Exploration and Evaluation Concessions
MEL2023-CA-ZA001,
MEL2023-CAZA002 and MEL2023-CA-ZA003 are
awarded for two years to Estrella Murak
Rai, forming the joint-venture between
Estrella
Resources
Representante
Permanente (70%) and Murak Rai Timor
(30%).
•
Reconnaissance Permits ESR-RP-01,
ESR-RP-02, ESR-RP-03, ESR-RP-04,
were converted to Exploration Licenses
and are awarded to Estrella Resources
Limited
Representante
Permanente
(100%)
•
Exploration and Evaluation Concessions
MEL2024-DA-ZB001,
MEL2024-DAZB002 and MEL2024-DA-ZB003 are
awarded for four years to Estrella Murak
Rai, forming the joint-venture between
Estrella
Resources
Representante
Permanente (70%) and Murak Rai Timor
(30%).
•
Estrella also operated Reconnaissance
Permits ESR-RP-01, ESR-RP-02 and
ESR-RP-03
•
Estrella
Resources
Limited
Representante Permanente and Estrella
Murak Rai are registered in Timor-Leste
and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Estrella Resources Limited (Australia).
•
All of the Concessions and Permits are
current and in good standing.
•
The first exploration was conducted by
Allied Mining Corporation in 1937 during
which mineral potential was discovered.
Very small-scale mining of manganese,
gold and construction material was
conducted. The exploration was not
systematic and hampered by difficult
access.
•
Other work in the early 2000’s has been
conducted by the Pacific Economic
Cooperation Council -PECC Minerals
Network to assist Timor-Leste to
understand and develop its minerals
potential.
•
Local geologists and companies have
sporadically explored the area however
there has been no documentation
collected nor systematic exploration to
quantify mineral occurrences.
•
No minerals drilling has taken place.
•
No close-spaced geophysics has taken
place.
•
No systematic, modern exploration has
taken place.
•
The Geological Institute of Timor-Leste
(IGTL) has recently (and still is)
conducting stratigraphic analysis and
fossil dating to reconstruct the geological
history of Timor-Leste.
•
The current Concessions and Permits
host three main forms of manganese
mineralisation.
•
Primary mineralisation can be found in
stratigraphic banded cherts and banded
irons formed from direct precipitation of
manganese onto the sea floor. Evidence
for both microbial and inorganic
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Drill hole
information
• A summary of all information material to the
under-standing of the exploration results
including a tabulation of the following
information for all Material drill holes:
• easting and northing of the drill hole
collar
• elevation or RL (Reduced Level –
elevation above sea level in metres) of
the drill hole collar
• dip and azimuth of the hole
• down hole length and interception depth
• hole length
• If the exclusion of this information is justified
on the basis that the information is not
Material and this exclusion does not detract
from the understanding of the report, the
Competent Person should clearly explain
why this is the case.
• In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averaging techniques, maximum and/or
minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of
high grades) and cut-off grades are usually
Material and should be stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate
short lengths of high grade results and
longer lengths of low grade results, the
procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical
examples of such aggregations should be
shown in detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting of
metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
• These
relationships
are
particularly
important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.
• If the geometry of the mineralisation with
respect to the drill hole angle is known, its
nature should be reported.
• If it is not known and only the down hole
lengths are reported, there should be a clear
statement to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole
length, true width not known’).
Data
aggregation
methods
Relationship
between
mineralisation
widths and
intercept
lengths
Diagrams
Balanced
Reporting
• Appropriate maps and sections (with scales)
and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being
reported. These should include, but not be
limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used to
locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and
Commentary
processes exist.
•
Secondary mineralisation exists as a
supergene blanket above the cherts
where they have been exposed to
chemical weathering.
•
Tertiary mineralisation exists where high
rainfall and erosion has sorted and
concentrated detrital manganese into
river paleo-channels or scree deposits.
•
Alluvial gold mineralisation has been
reported in the area however no
exploration has been undertaken.
•
Estrella will use and expand upon the
current known stratigraphy to evaluate
and document mineralisation styles and
relate them back to the tectonostratigraphic genesis of the area.
• No drilling has been undertaken in the
area.
• Sample locations are shown in the body of
the text.
•
•
•
Exploration results with all relevant
drillhole information are reported in the
body of the text.
No aggregation methods have been used
save for length-weighted composite grades
for significant intercepts.
Metal equivalent values have not been
used.
•
Any relationships have been discussed
within the body of the text or depicted in
diagrams.
•
Relevant diagrams have been included
within the main body of text.
•
No new information has been withheld.
Criteria
Other
substantive
exploration
data
Further work
JORC Code explanation
other locations used in Mineral Resource
estimation.
• Where comprehensive reporting of all
Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high
grades and/or widths should be practiced to
avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
• Other exploration data, if meaningful and
material, should be reported including (but
not limited to): geological observations;
geophysical survey results; geochemical
survey results; bulk samples - size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test
results;
bulk
density,
groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics;
potential deleterious or contaminating
substances.
• The nature and scale of planned further
work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large- scale step-out
drilling).
• Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of
possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling
areas, provided this information is not
commercially sensitive.
Commentary
•
All observations are discussed within the
body of the text.
•
Further work by ESR will include
trenching and drilling.
Additional work on specific areas will be
included under the heading Next Steps in
the body of the text when appropriate to
do so.
•
Share your feedback
Discover